Bloomfield Press
  Home     Books   National Directory Position Papers   Alan’s Blog      FAQ      New Stuff     Search  
COMPLETE ALPHABETICAL LIST OF PRODUCTS Catalog
Gun LawsGun Rights Gun PoliticsFree SpeechVideosSelf Defense and Safety
SurvivalPolice GuidesKnivesNovelsThe Founders PackageHistory of Rights
ButtonsRecent Additions  123Women & KidsFirst-Time Gun Owners
E-BooksNewest ProductsCloseoutsPackage Deals

 

 



The 2016 Travelers Guide
All 50 states gun laws -- In Stock!
Click https://www.gunlaws.com/travel.htm



PAGE NINE No. 160
Oct. 6, 2016




...ran my column about an issue
that belongs in the presidential debate.

Some people got a bad link -- here's a good one (sorry):
http://townhall.com/columnists/alankorwin/2016/09/25/shouldnt-the-presidential-debate-ask-about-guns-we-already-have-n2223393

Tinyurl version of the same link:
http://tinyurl.com/h2vx4ot

If you take a quick look it will help raise its online score
and increase the chances it gets heard in the right places.

Besides, it's a real thinker.
That's why they ran it.

Alan.

P.S. You can always just visit Townhall.com and
search on my name for a list of all my work there.

--

GunsAmerica ran a related piece of mine, The American Protection of Arms Declaration:

https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/korwin-american-protection-arms-declaration/

Some recent political promises are infringement, and thus illegal.
Consider running that in your local newsletters and club publications.
Permission granted.


||||



Click for eBooks!

https://www.gunlaws.com/books22-ebooks.htm


CONTENTS

1- Wolf Blitzer's Professional Demise
Recent Interview Ends All Doubt

2
- "Don't Inspire Evil Initiative" for Journalists
New support
We made our voice heard at national journalism conference

3- Trump Pfumpfers Through No-Fly-Fraud

The No-Fly Scheme Seems Attractive -- But It's Tyranny
They didn't get the memo?


4- U.S. Nukes Stored at Turkey's Airbase At Risk
Official's Lies Are Blatant, Self Evident
As safe as "Blocks of concrete"? C'mon!
We'll Never Get Truth About Foiled Coup


5- Early Voting Is Dangerous
"News" Incentives Should Be Warnings

6- To Be Fair Just Let Anyone Vote

7- Take Away The Bad Guns
New York Times assaults good guns



----::::----


Can't see this email? Want prior editions? https://www.gunlaws.com/PageNineIndex.htm
Page Nine is a Blog -- Automatic RSS feeds: http://www.pagenine.org
Get Page Nine through Twitter -- http://www.twitter.com/page_nine



Author Alan Korwin
Click image for more pics and videos


-- Tell your friends -- Permission to circulate granted -- and encouraged.

Page Nine on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/pageninewatchblog

Gun Laws dot com on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/gunlawsdotcom

TrainMeAZ on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/TrainMeAZ


     

Alan on YouTube (COOL!) --
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=alan+korwin+gunlaws.com



:::-—-:::


UPCOMING APPEARANCES -- MEET ME AT:


AzCDL Annual Meeting, Oct. 8
Sheraton Crescent Hotel, Dunlap at I-17, Phoenix
"Tasteful open carry of holstered firearms appreciated."

Crossroads of the West Gun Show, Dec. 2-4
Phoenix Fairgrounds -- three days -- Biggest of the year



STARTERS



ATF Launches “Anonymous” Tip App
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has launched a new mobile app that enables the anonymous reporting of information regarding crimes or that could be used to help prevent the commission of crimes. With the reportit app, available through the App Store or on Google play, citizens can submit a tip and attach a photo or video. The information is forwarded to ATF in real time, but should not be used to report a crime that is currently in process. Submitters will have the option to provide personal information, but it is not required. (emphasis added). BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Alan: Is it possible this app doesn't already know who you are if you use it? Especially considering who designed it?

Top-notch expert: Oh I'm sure it does.
Second top-notch expert: Recommend you route any tips through Hillary's personal email server to be safe.
Third: Doesn't everyone know the system has to identify both ends of the address to deliver the message?
Names withheld but it doesn't matter anymore.


||||


Racism Definitioned
How to reply to: "That's racist." and "You're racist." --
"Define racist." Shuts 'em right up, they don't know (and typically you're not).
After the agonizing silence (or not), they babble and rave,
providing endless easy talking points and superb counter-punches.
Remember: "The person who charges racism typically is the racist."
Also: Noticing social, cultural and actual differences between races is not racism.
It's normal.


||||


LEGAL REMINDER--
Democrat arguments that America cannot legally ban immigrants is abject ignorance. If republicans were educated they would simply cut off the opposition at the knees with facts:

Federal law:
8 USC §1182 (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
(Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, enacted June 27, 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act.)

INADMISSIBLE ALIENS

[List reduced and abbreviated from 100 pages of statute:] Multiple health-related grounds like communicable diseases without cure, criminal grounds, substance traffickers, prostitution and commercial vice, religiously oppressive government officials as defined, human traffickers, money launderers, national security grounds, known terrorists, potential terrorists, people affiliated with terrorism, totalitarians (aimed at communists), Nazis, participants in genocide, users of child soldiers, people likely to become a "public charge" (welfare case), certain job applicants depending on job and other conditions, certain athletes, unqualified physicians and health-care workers (quacks), aliens on parole, false claimants of citizenship, stowaways, smugglers, visa abusers, people without passports, draft evaders, illegal aliens already here, repeat offenders, practicing polygamists, child abductors, unlawful voters, renunciants, tax evaders, other subcategories, exceptions and easy latitude to apply throughout, this is a partial list, courtesy Alan Korwin, Author, Gun Laws of America.



||||


HELPING REPORTERS DO THEIR JOBS
Tired of asking the same tired questions?
Need a good new one for Mr. Hussein-Obama, or Mrs. Rodham-Clinton?
"We understand you're against Mr. Trump's plan to build a wall to prevent people from illegally entering our nation through our southern border, yet you support doubling the height, from 7 to 14 feet, of the wall that keeps people from illegally entering the White House grounds. What in your opinion is the difference?"


||||



THE LAW OF SELF
DEFENSE


THE LAW OF SELF DEFENSE
The Indispensable Guide for the Armed Citizen
By Attorney Andrew F. Branca 292 pgs. #LOSD $25

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

Complete 50-state self-defense guide: You carry a gun so you’re hard to kill. Read this book so you’re hard to convict. An easy to understand, entertaining and informative manual that covers self-defense law in all 50 states. Clearly explains not just statutes but how courts apply them, corrects myths that get people in trouble, highly praised by many self-defense legends. Includes illuminating, gut-wrenching, true-life examples. Covers Reasonableness, Innocence, Imminence, Avoidance, and Proportionality, handling 911 and first responders, prejudiced witnesses and biased media, your state’s nuances, effective legal strategies.



||||




:::-—-:::


1- Wolf Blitzer's Professional Demise
Interview Ends All Doubt

CNN, 9/13/16 -- With a news-like demeanor and a professional tone, Wolf Blitzer actually asked a sitting U.S. Senator, "So why is Donald Trump refusing to release his tax returns?"

And with that seemingly newsworthy inquiry, Blitzer gave up the last shred of pretense that he is a journalist or reporter, and is merely a political partisan in tailored suits. The question was a perfect paradigm of the rest of his broadcast.

That question, which has been posed and addressed thousands of times literally answers itself. The people like Blitzer who ache for the information want to find things they can use to hurt Trump. Trump wants to keep it under wraps to stop them and protect himself. Everyone knows this implicitly. It's been regurgitated ad infinitum. Why even ask -- it only shows you're a partisan.

Trump has replied endlessly (Blitzer of course knows this) he is waiting for the IRA audit of him to complete. Until then, the returns are preliminary, and subject to change. That is so normal, asking the question gets an F in Journalism 101, and a dunce cap. Two dunce caps to the reporters who want the returns to see what Trump is worth -- your tax returns don't reveal that. An imbecile who files returns knows that, a commentary on too many First-Amendment-protected reporters. After the audit, Trump may stall anew, everyone knows this too.

What Blitzer should ask a sitting Senator when he gets one to speak with him, is, for example, what's happening about the $400 million in cash the terrorists in Iran got in cash from us, that's now $1.7 billion in foreign currency? Which bank cobbled together that much dough, in foreign currency? What does "provide material support to terrorists" mean (18 USC §2339A et seq.)
?

Or he could ask, "Now that so many counties and states have only one health-care provider going broke and hanging on by a thread under ObamaCare, and customers everywhere have had price increases, is the system truly on the verge of collapse?" "Can it be held off until Obama is out of office?"

Or, what's happening in Chad where terrorist training camps are set up? What is Canada doing with its tar sands oil while we stall around? Or, if a person isn't free to fly, why can they drive? (full story below) How about, How do you justify the Dept. of Education, since it's not authorized by the Constitution? Or my favorite, especially good for candidates but good for politicians too, What's the purpose of government? Need more? Try The Liberty Poll: https://www.gunlaws.com/the%20liberty%20poll.htm

Only a reporter would be asking such things. We don't seem to have any left.



:::-—-:::



2- Don't Inspire Evil Initiative
Support Grows, Media Remains Immune


__________ON LETTERHEAD__________








__________ON LETTERHEAD__________



 

Do you belong to a national group that would support this campaign?

Send me a letter on your letterhead expressing that support, and I'll make sure it becomes part of the program.

Hundreds of journalists at the annual Society of Professional Journalists (spj.org) conference in New Orleans were exposed to this message in September. So far, there has been no direct feedback or visible results. Leadership received letters like the ones above, and other materials, by fax to their hotel, by email, and by telephone, so we know they got the message.

This program is ongoing. News as it happens.



:::-—-:::

We have new books!
Click the image and browse a bit


Bloomfield Press has added dozens of new books -- including some classics!
For a good time...  click the image!
https://www.gunlaws.com/books21Newest.htm

50-state Knife-Law guide!
(AT LAST! And fascinating too.)

50-state Self-Defense-Law guide!
(Two of them actually, one easy, one deep)

Stunning new analysis of hunting accidents
(Two buddies noticed reports were shallow, dug deep, great insights)

New political novels

New guides for women


PLUS

Guides to YOUR State gun laws
("It doesn't make sense to own a gun and not know the rules")

How to be more effective politically
(Stop complaining and learn how to do something)

How America got to be so great
(I love this one, real short chapters, easy reading, cheap)

We've got buttons and more!






Come back here when you're done reading the Page Nine news!

:::-—-:::


3- Trump Pfumpfers Through No-Fly-Fraud


The No Fly Scheme Seems Attractive -- But It's Tyranny

They didn't get the memo?


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:


During the first presidential debate, Trump, flustered and unprepared, almost said he thinks the secret-police no-fly list is a good way to deny gun rights. In typical unfortunate fashion, as the transcript here shows (his thoughts are disjointed, but you can sort of get his gist from his incomplete sentence fragments):

“First of all, I agree, and a lot of people even within my own party want to give certain rights to people on watch lists and no- fly lists. I agree with you,” Trump told Hillary*. “When a person is on a watch list or a no-fly list. I have the endorsement of the NRA, which I'm very proud of. These are very, very good people, and they're protecting the Second Amendment.” “But,” he continued, “I think we have to look very strongly at no-fly lists and watch lists. And when people are on there, even if they shouldn't be on there, we'll help them, we'll help them legally, we'll help them get off. But I tend to agree with that quite strongly.” (Agree with what exactly?)

He later tweets: "I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

Moments later the NRA responds: Happy to meet @realdonaldtrump. Our position is no guns for terrorists-period. Due process & right to self-defense for law-abiding Americans

NRA's Chris Cox, same day:

“The NRA's position on this issue has not changed. The NRA believes that terrorists should not be allowed to purchase or possess firearms, period. Anyone on a terror watch list who tries to buy a gun should be thoroughly investigated by the FBI and the sale delayed while the investigation is ongoing. If an investigation uncovers evidence of terrorist activity or involvement, the government should be allowed to immediately go to court, block the sale, and arrest the terrorist.

At the same time, due process protections should be put in place that allow law-abiding Americans who are wrongly put on a watch list to be removed. That has been the position of Sen. John Cornyn (R.-Tex.) and a majority of the U.S. Senate.  Sadly, President Obama and his allies would prefer to play politics with this issue.”

*In a lengthy anti-gun-rights monologue, Rodham-Clinton included this: "And we finally need to pass a prohibition on anyone who’s on the terrorist watch list from being able to buy a gun in our country. If you’re too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun." The no-fly list is a small (70,000) sub-set of the terrorist watch list (about 1 million). "Buy a new gun" and "have lots of guns" are different, one without the other makes no sense, and journalists, predictably, never ask about such things.

When the bill gets drafted, typically, it bears little resemblance to public statements. The current bill is an uncontrolled grant of power to authorities to regulate transfer of firearms, under the rubric of a no-fly something or other:

https://www.gunlaws.com/FlakeAmendmentHR2578.htm
"No district court of the United States or court of appeals
of the United States shall have jurisdiction to consider the
lawfulness or constitutionality of this section..."




The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:


Forget what Rodham-Clinton said ("If you’re too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun.") --

If you're too dangerous to fly, you're too dangerous to be out walking around free. Right?

Should some reporter somewhere have asked her about that? What's wrong with these people? (The reporters, we know what's wrong with jihadis who should not be out walking around.)

Don't Airport Checkpoint Scanners Work On These People?

You're not telling us checkpoints are just for show and don't work, are you?

If people are too dangerous to get on a plane to Cincinnati,
why can they go there by AmTrak, or Greyhound, or car, or on foot?

Who are these people? (It's a secret.)
Are they even charged with anything? (No.)

You mean the Constitution has been suspended for American citizens,
because they're named on a police list -- in secret? A secret-police list?

Can politicians do that -- and remain in office?
Doesn't that violate the oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution? (It does.)

Are Americans awake?
How can you run for office with that as a platform?

The entire tyrannical travesty is spelled out here:
https://www.gunlaws.com/TheNoFlyLieMustDie.htm

No-fly no-buy is a subtle but seductive error of logic --
and violates everything America stands for. For example:

Q: If you can't buy a gun,
what about all the guns you already have?

Didn't the moderator think about that?
Didn't you?
Rodham-Clinton is coming for your guns.

||||




Cop Jokes


Cop Jokes

By Lou Savelli and Stuart Moss 140 p. #CJ $9.95

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

Lighten up with the hysterical book by former police officers
who've collected humor for years about their profession,
victims, criminal offenders, the justice system, no one is immune
from their scathing wit, I laughed out loud a lot.
How many cops does it take to throw a guy down the stairs? The guy fell.



:::-—-:::



4-
U.S. Nukes Stored at Turkey's Airbase At Risk
Official's Lies Are Blatant, Self Evident

Safe as "Blocks of concrete"? C'mon!

We'll Never Get Truth About Foiled Coup




The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:


Tribune News Service
http://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/1994052/coup-attempt-turkey-raises-nuclear-concern-us-air-base

[Note: Turkey, a staunch and formerly stable U.S. ally, has housed U.S. nuclear weapons for decades. The foiled coup in July raised questions about the security of those bombs.]

Wesley Clark, the retired 4-star general who was a NATO supreme allied commander in the 1990s, is quoted by Tribune News Service (link above) about the dozens of nukes U.S. has stashed in Turkey: “They are very secure.” He said they could be extracted quickly if the situation deteriorated, and the electronic locks on the bombs would render them useless: “If you captured them, it would be like having a block of concrete.”

The Tribune states that the B61s are broadly considered more a political symbol of US commitment to the NATO alliance than a military asset. The US does not have aircraft at Incirlik airfield qualified to deliver the weapons.

For the weapons to be used, the US would have to fly a squadron of aircraft into Incirlik to load the bombs, all of which would be observed by Russia and possibly make the base a target of a first strike.


The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:


If the airbase in southern Turkey base is overrun by neighboring Syria, or the Islamic radicals in Syria, both just a short drive away, or the poorly identified coup rebels already in Turkey, the scores of nuclear bombs there are anything but secure, this much is obvious to a retard, a word that politically correct forces threaten us for using. Clark is not retarded but perhaps thinks we are.

Calling captured nuclear bombs with trigger locks "blocks of concrete" wouldn't fool Oliver Wendell Holmes, who recognized a three-tier hierarchy of idiots -- morons, imbeciles and idiots, from stupid to stupidest. He decided it was fine to sterilize a woman because she was in category two, an imbecile (and she wasn't actually but the federal government sterilized her anyway, thanks to Oliver). But I digress.

A nuclear weapon even without a trigger, let alone one with a perfect trigger lock (and there is no such thing, since someone can operate it, right?) is packed solid with enough unstable nuclear metal to explode -- uranium or plutonium -- just what jihadis or terrorists want. And it's also got enough hi-tech hi-explosives to set it off, that's how these things work. A block of concrete indeed! What sort of blockheads do they think we are? Even unbathed jihadis in rags can figure this much out. Journalists, reportedly intelligent, didn't question the general.

As to acting easily and getting them out quick, and I won't reference Benghazi here, the political implications of "declaring" the situation so dire, and our most heavily armed NATO ally unfit to store the things by rashly pulling them out, this is drastic or we'd have done it long ago, aside from demonstrating how weak we now are.

And finally, the abject nonsense that we have no system qualified for delivering a B61 tactical nuke, a design from the early 1960s and among our oldest, whose yield apparently ranges from 300 tons to 170 kilotons of TNT, c'mon! If the Iranians had one, just for starters, they could put the fissile material and explosives in a truck with some guy and a hammer. We delivered in WWII in a propeller plane.

I just don't see how the "news" could get any worse.


||||



ETHICS


ETHICS
An Early American Handbook (1890 Reprint!)
By Benjamin Comegys 128 p. #ET $7.95

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

Who can live up to these simple, decent standards—but they spell out the America you’d like to see our nation get back to! This marvelous little book, a reproduction of the original 1890 text which describes how good people behave, from honesty to industry, duty to playmates to “treatment of dumb animals.” May sound lightweight today, but only if you've been dumbed down: you’ll instantly recognize what America (and you?) have lost and need back. Worth every penny.





:::-—-:::





5- Early Voting Is Dangerous

"News" Incentives Should Be Warnings



The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:


Be sure to register for early voting. Your vote counts.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Do NOT vote early.

It helps guarantee your vote will NOT count.

The nation is supposed to rise up as one, on a single day, and choose our next elected leaders. It makes us a political unit, cohesive, from many, one. E pluribus unum. This is important.

That's the plan. It's a good plan. I'm not going to go into all the reasons, look it up if you want to understand your nation better. This 1994 paper, when early voting was rare, describes it pretty well.  http://www.eac.gov/assets/1/Page/Innovations%20in%20Election%20Administration%209.pdf

Spreading the election over a month or more is practically a plot. It wipes out the original inspired plan. Between the bogus early date and the real constitutional election date, candidates die, get murdered, they are arrested, they withdraw, you learn they are lowdown sly lying sidewinding snakes worse than you knew, and worse. Your vote gets wasted.

In the recent primaries hundreds of thousands of people early voted for Canadian-Cuban-American Ted Cruz who was on the ballot but no longer running. The same for Cuban-American Marco Rubio. They wasted their votes. You know who you are. But it gets worse.

The live tallies election night count real votes. Early votes sit in envelope boxes to get opened and counted later -- only if the election is close enough statistically to matter. Is that what you want?

Yeah, I know the arguments. Early voting is so convenient! Voting is not about convenience, it's about running America. I don't want to miss voting! You don't miss an airplane, don't miss the vote. I have to tell you this? I may be out of town and need an absentee ballot! Did I say anything about legit absentees? Sheesh.

But again, the main thing is the spirit of the thing. Rise up with your neighbors and select your leaders on the same day. Don't spread it out over an arduous month so the election becomes an afterthought. So the choice is made before election day -- that practically is a plot.  Sure, I wish we had better choices than we do. I always do. And I admit to having no solution to that conundrum.

||||




   

SPECTACULAR NEW PRODUCTS FROM BLOOMFIELD PRESS

Check out the new FREE catalog on that page!



:::-—-:::



6-
To Be Fair Just Let Anyone Vote

No, of course not, I'm mocking the idiot left


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

Democrats object strongly to the need for Photo ID at the polls. The ACLU has filed numerous lawsuits to stop the evil controversial practice aimed at suppressing the vote by evil republicans.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Why is it unreasonable to expect people to provide government proof of who they are before voting in a government election?

Put another way, why would you want a person who can't get a job, or unemployment, open a bank account, rent an apartment, or a hotel room, buy a home, get a mortgage, buy a gun, go to college, get on an airplane, visit a doctor, get government aid, buy a cell phone or drive a car... to vote? Who are these people?

Followup question: Should our elections be limited to only citizens eligible to vote? Is it OK for people who are foreigners or otherwise ineligible to vote in our election, to vote?

||||






PreFense


PreFense
The 90% Advantage
By Steve Tarani, 288 p. #PF $24.95

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

The best gunfight is the one you avoid. With a stellar resume in defense, law enforcement and covert intelligence work, speaker and educator Tarani opens your thinking about awareness and the kind of prep that keeps you safe and miles away from needing to draw your gun. See incidents coming like the pros do and avoid them entirely instead of reacting—which is halfway to defeat.

Winning a gunfight is heroic, totally macho, creates stories to tell for a lifetime, and can basically ruin the wonderful life you are living now. You'll almost certainly face years of courts, astronomical expense, wary looks from your neighbors, it will affect your career, relatives, friends, there is no way to express how much better you will be if you can follow the golden rule: It's always better to avoid a gunfight than to win one. That's what this book is all about. Be fully not partially prepared.




JUST CAME OUT!



All our books, DVDs and other goods are listed here by category and alphabetically
https://www.gunlaws.com/books.htm


:::-—-:::



7- Take Away The Bad Guns

New York Times assaults the best guns, the ones the public wants

The gloves are off, no more weasel words, confiscation on page one



The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:


OMG, The New York Times ran an editorial on Page One! Pundits go wild!
The first time since 1920, so it must be critically important!
(Readers of The New York Times of course know a good percentage
of everything in that paper is editorial, and it is not right-of-center,
it is hopelessly biased to the left.) This one demands gun confiscation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-america.html



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

For years the gun-owning public has known left-wing radicals like the people at The New York Times and their followers want to outlaw guns and confiscate them from the public.

The left wing, in typical totalitarian fashion, has denied it, lying to our faces. They've decided to stop lying, though we've outed them in the past. Now it's a big deal the The Times said it in an editorial on their front page, as if this is more meaningful than all the other covert and overt threats we have endured, and stories they have run. They said:

"Certain kinds of weapons... and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership."

It's time to, "require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens."

Just wait until you see the bills they draft to do this.

Diane Feinstein's bill outlawed guns with grips. I kid you not.
https://www.gunlaws.com/FeinsteinGunBanBillAnalysis.htm

Bobby Rush's bill required tests, designed by government,
with no controls (and more) before you could exercise your rights.
https://www.gunlaws.com/GunLawUpdate4-SHOTnHR45.htm




:::-—-:::




Have you seen our hot-off-the-press new catalog?
Download it now for free:
https://www.gunlaws.com/pdf/BPCatalog2016.pdf


 Read all about it:
https://www.gunlaws.com/catalog.htm


:::-—-:::








Sovereign Duty


Sovereign Duty

By KrisAnne Hall, 200 p. #SD $15

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

Among the most moving patriotic speakers you’ll ever hear—Hall rekindles your awareness of how America began, reminding you of your sovereign duty as a citizen, where real solutions to our problems reside. Energized by the Founders’ brilliant plans, which have been all but lost in the schools, media and culture, this wealth of history and forgotten values is a rebirth.


:::-—-:::


P.S. SAVE THE DATE: The Crossroads of the West gun show Super-sized Christmas show, Dec. 2 - 4, 2016, I'll have a whole spread of our fascinating new products, latest editions of our gun law books, autographing and speaking with friends and fans... possibly dangerous times ahead (and we'll know who the president will be!!).



_______________________________
COMMENTS HELP KEEP ME GOING

Your article about "guns on the street" was great! I have always thought about that and I have another one you probably have thought about: the anti-gun people have an expression that irritates me no end. That is THERE ARE (HOWEVER MANY) MILLION GUNS IN CIRCULATION.  What do they mean by CIRCULATION?  It's like all the guns are continually flowing from one hand to another and they don't stay with any one person very long.  I propose that the vast majority of guns are NEVER traded or "circulated" since they are purchased!  D.S.
[Just another hoplophobic terror these people are burdened with D.S.; to them, guns are floating around in some ether poised to do harm. These folks need treatment but never get any. In the first debate, Rodham-Clinton said, "We’ve got too many military-style weapons on the streets." Guns are in people's homes, as we all know, and "military-style" is just prejudice.

||||

Another great article, Alan. Not only are you a very good writer, but you have a good sense and "eye" or feel for the reality of the situation and go straight to the point.  Thanks for all that you do! William J.S.

||||

Hi Alan, Just finishing “After you Shoot”. Hopefully I never have to find out what is involved “first hand". Very good reading. Glad you include everyone's point of view. Thank you, Pat

||||



WHY EVERYONE MUST LEARN TO SHOOT!

Jack9CoverSm


The Newest Gran’pa Jack
Co-Written by ALAN KORWIN !

Why Jews Must Learn To Shoot! Gran'pa Jack #9
Kjartan Arnorsson and Alan Korwin, with the late Ray Carter
24 pgs., only $3, or 2 for $5
, we pay the postage!

So politically incorrect it could catch fire, the reasons everyone should learn how to shoot, with all the villains who want to kill you and destroy America named. We wake up anyone who doesn't realize the schools are keeping our kids ignorant, religious leaders are practically worse, and politicians who should help get you trained instead are seeking to disarm us. Blacks, Arabs, drug lords, The U.N., muslims, muggers, thieves, bad cops, we spare no one in a quest to motivate the naive to action. A thrilling teaching tool, get a few, enjoy it, and pass them around. You owe it to your family and friends to spread the word -- encourage learn to shoot!

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif One copy, $3, free shipping
add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif  Two copies, $5, still free shipping

Get a dozen for $20 bucks and really do some good with them.
add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif  (S&H at cost)

Read More: The ORLANDO JIHADI ATTACK!





Alan Korwin
Bloomfield Press
"We publish the gun laws."


4848 E. Cactus, #505-440
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
602-996-4020 Phone
602-494-0679 Fax
1-800-707-4020 Orders

https://www.gunlaws.com
alan@gunlaws.com
Call, write, fax or click for our  f r e e full-color catalog


Guns Save Lives
Guns Stop Crime
Guns Are Why America Is Still  F r e e



My how you've grown!





 

Add yourself to this free list:
(Alan's private email list -- used infrequently for Page Nine
and gun-law updates; you can unsubscribe at any time)

*  Your email address:
*  Preferred Format:

 

COMPLETE ALPHABETICAL LIST OF PRODUCTS
Gun LawsGun Rights Gun PoliticsFree SpeechVideosSelf Defense and Safety
SurvivalPolice GuidesKnivesNovelsThe Founders PackageHistory of Rights
ButtonsRecent Additions  123Women & KidsFirst-Time Gun Owners
E-BooksNewest ProductsCloseoutsPackage Deals
  Home     Books   National Directory Position Papers   Alan’s Blog      FAQ      New Stuff     Search  
Bloomfield Press

gunlaws.com and bloomfieldpress.com are domains owned by Alan Korwin.

Alan is a nationally recognized author of numerous books
on gun laws and other topics.

If you like this site you'll like his books. Take a look